The Feline Tritrichomonas Project Better outcomes for cats
Home/Diagnosis
Tritrichomonas foetus · Tritrichomonas blagburni

The cheap test misses it most of the time

Most cats with this infection have already had a fecal test come back normal. That is not a mistake in the test — it is what the test is for. Here is which one to ask for, and how the sample should be taken.

Evidence-graded Reviewer of record: pending Last verified 26 Oct 2026
This page does not diagnose your cat. It explains what different tests can and cannot tell you, so that you and a veterinarian can choose the right one. Any test has to be interpreted against your cat's history, and a negative result never rules an infection out on its own.

Why the microscope fails

A direct fecal smear — a drop of stool under a microscope — is quick, cheap, and finds this organism only around 14% of the time when the cat genuinely has it. There are three reasons, and they compound:

  • The organism sheds intermittently. A cat tested on a good week may simply not be shedding that day.
  • It is fragile. Samples that are refrigerated or examined hours later may contain nothing recognizable.
  • It looks like Giardia, and like Pentatrichomonas hominis, so it can be either missed or misidentified.

The usual way to tell them apart by eye is movement: this organism swims with a rapid, jerky, forward motion, while Giardia drifts like a falling leaf. That is a real skill, and it is not a reliable substitute for a DNA test.

The sensitivity ladder

Figures below are approximate and vary by study, assay and population — treat them as the shape of the problem, not as precise constants.

Approximate detection sensitivity
MethodSensitivityNotes
Direct fecal smear≈14%Must be fresh, never refrigerated. A negative tells you almost nothing.
Culture (InPouch TF)≈56–59%Better, but slow, and still needs fresh handling.
PCR≈94%The sensitive test. Detects DNA, so sample handling is less fragile.

Ask for a fecal loop, not a flush

This is the detail most owner-facing material has not caught up with, and it matters.

Because the organism lives in the mucus on the colon wall, the historic advice was that washing the colon out — a colonic flush — gave the best sample. That advice was later described by the researchers themselves as having been based on anecdote.

Then it was measured. Across 1,717 cats, samples taken with a fecal loop — a small plastic loop used to scrape material from the rectal wall — were 2.04 times more likely to be PCR-positive than samples taken by colonic flush, and there was no significant difference between a flush and a plain voided stool.1 The authors suggested the loop works because it collects at the mucosal surface where the organisms actually adhere.

The order of preference Fecal loop > colonic flush ≥ freshly voided stool.

If your veterinarian offers a colonic flush, that is not a mistake — it was the recommendation for years and it is still better than a stool from the litter box. But a loop is better still, it is simpler, and it is reasonable to ask.

Two practical things that affect the result

Sample on a bad day

Because shedding is intermittent, the single best thing you can do is bring a sample taken while the cat is actively having diarrhea. If you can, take it in on the day rather than storing it.

Keep litter out of it

Certain cat litters contain substances that inhibit the PCR reaction. A sample scraped from the cat rather than scooped from a tray avoids the problem entirely — another quiet argument for the loop.

A live disagreement: should antibacterial drugs be withdrawn first?

Guidance from the European advisory body (ABCD) advises stopping oral antibacterials for around seven days before collecting a sample, on the reasoning that antibiotics reduce the organism or mask it.

But the same 1,717-cat study looked directly for that effect and found no association between prior antibiotic, antiparasitic, anticoccidial or corticosteroid treatment and a positive PCR result.1

So the guideline says withdraw and the largest dataset says it made no difference. Which one is right is not settled. This page presents both rather than picking the tidier version — and if your cat is currently on antibiotics for another reason, that is a question for your vet, not a reason to delay a test on this site's authority.

What the stool tells you, and what it cannot

Stool appearance is genuinely useful, and it is also the most over-read thing in this whole condition. Here is the part that helps, then the part that misleads.

The two patterns vets actually distinguish

"Chronic diarrhea" is not one thing. The first fork is whether the problem sits in the small intestine or the large. This organism lives in the large intestine, so it produces the second column.

Large bowel vs small bowel signs
Large bowel (colon) — the pattern hereSmall bowel
Small volume, passed frequentlyLarge volume, passed less often
Mucus, oftenMucus unusual
Fresh red blood, oftenDark or digested blood, if any
Straining, urgency, tenesmusLittle straining
Weight loss late or mildWeight loss often prominent
Markedly foul smell, frequently reportedVariable

Why a scoring system beats "it looks loose"

Veterinary practice uses standardized fecal scoring — most commonly a 1–7 scale, where 1 is hard and dry and 7 is watery with no form. It exists so that two people describing the same stool use the same words, and so that change over time can be measured rather than remembered.

Ask your veterinarian to record a fecal score at each visit, and note it yourself between visits. That single habit does more for monitoring than any photograph, because it is comparable and it is already used in your cat's record.

Does my cat have this?

A fecal score describes the stool. It cannot tell you which organism is in it, so use the list below instead when you are deciding whether to book a visit — and take it with you.

  • Diarrhea lasting more than two weeks, or coming back after treatment or a diet change.
  • Stool that smells markedly worse than usual — owners describe it as foul, rancid or lingering, and it is one of the most consistently reported features.
  • A young cat, or a cat from a shelter, cattery or multi-cat household. Age and crowding are the two strongest risks in the published data.
  • Weight loss, or a kitten who is not gaining, even if the stool has improved.
  • A fecal test that came back normal while the diarrhea carried on. That result is the most common finding in cats who turn out to have this.
  • Straining, urgency, or accidents outside the tray, especially with a sense that the cat cannot wait.
  • Another cat in the house with the same problem, now or in the last few months.
Any one of these is enough Suspicion alone warrants investigation. You do not need to reach a particular fecal score, and a low one is not reassurance: in one sanctuary population, 10% of cats whose stool looked entirely normal tested positive. Ask your veterinarian about Tritrichomonas by name, and ask for PCR on a fecal loop sample rather than a smear or a flush.
The limit that matters more than the photographs Stool appearance cannot diagnose this infection, and it cannot rule it out. In one sanctuary population, 10% of cats with completely normal stool tested positive. A cat whose stool looks unremarkable is not therefore clear, and a cat with terrible stool may have something else entirely. Appearance is a clue about which part of the gut is involved — not about which organism is in it.
Reference photographs are being prepared, deliberately not sourced. We have not used stock or forum photographs for this, and the reason is worth stating: a useful reference image has to be comparable. That means the same lighting, the same background, the same camera distance and something in frame for scale. An arbitrary photo pulled from the internet teaches the eye the wrong thing. The two properly validated charts in use — the Purina and Waltham fecal scoring systems — are also copyrighted and cannot simply be reproduced.

The plan is therefore to photograph a standardized 1–7 set in-house, or to reproduce a published chart with written permission and attribution. Until then, this page describes the patterns in words and points you at a fecal score, which is the more useful measure anyway.

Where the testing happens

North Carolina State University runs a dedicated Tritrichomonas diagnostic laboratory for this organism. Its stated policy is that it cannot advise cat owners directly and cannot return calls to owners, because of volume — but referring veterinarians can consult the senior researcher. Several commercial laboratories also offer the PCR.

If your vet has not heard of this For an uncommon diagnosis, most general practitioners will not have seen a case. Bring a request, not a verdict: the test name (PCR for Tritrichomonas), the sample method (fecal loop), and the fact that a specialist laboratory exists. You will get further that way, and you will be easier to help.

Sources

  1. Hedgespeth BA, Stauffer SH, Gookin JL. Association of fecal sample collection technique and treatment history with Tritrichomonas foetus PCR test results in 1,717 cats. J Vet Intern Med 2020;34:734–741.
  2. Gookin JL, Birkenheuer AJ, Breitschwerdt EB, Levy MG. Single-tube nested PCR for detection of T. foetus in feline feces. J Clin Microbiol 2002;40:4126–4130.
  3. Gookin JL, Hanrahan K, Levy MG. The conundrum of feline trichomonosis. J Feline Med Surg 2017;19:261–274.
  4. ABCD. Guideline for trichomonosis. abcdcatsvets.org.